While brainstorm together, countries who are living luxurious life

While this is not likely to happen next
year, nonetheless we must be ready for the megatrend. The demand for food,
water and energy will escalated as population is increasing. Existing Systems
such as the Green Revolution are likely capable of producing enough food, but
to do so in a comprehensive and justifiable manner will require major
transformations. The challenges raised by this megatrend can be tackled through
novelty, fresh ideas and new industries as well as initiatives such as the UN’s
Sustainable Development Goals.22-24 We must dare to imagine new way
for a radically different future.

Thus far
individuals and government leaders appear oblivious, reluctant, or unable to
deal with the growing imbalances between human population numbers and the
growing demand of resources. The interconnections existing among the
availability of resources and population density are neither recognized nor
understood. Humans have a disappointing record in micromanaging their essential
resources from over exploitation in the face of rapidly growing populations.25
Historically, decisions are normally made when crises or natural disasters
strike. Instead of examining the problem in a holistic manner, impromptu decisions
have been made on protecting particular resource. Based on past experience, we
have the tendency as humans to make tough decisions only when the situation
becomes intolerable or irreversible. For example, China had to make an urgent
decision to be able to solve its overpopulation catastrophe and for that matter
the growing demand of resources.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

One of the
strategies to solve this problem is to focus on the conservation and the management
of food, water, and energy needed for the production of resources. The
conservation of these resources will require coordinated efforts and incentives
from individuals and countries. Businesses and governments will have to work
together to increase productivity, encourage innovation, and improve
integration in supply chains toward a sustainable global food balance. Our leadership
of world resources must change, and the basic needs of people must be balanced
with those resources that sustain human life. As citizens of a corrupted
system, we choose to encourage politicians and rural economies especially those
who allowed inexpedient disruption.

Solving the
current situation with poverty and malnutrition right now can relieve the
problem with improved environmental management and the redistribution of food for
the 1.5 billion people currently in poverty.24-25 Just instance, if
we were to brainstorm together, countries who are living luxurious life when
they are overconsuming could probably down-sized their standard living conditions.
For instance, American and European families could reduce their standard of
living with overconsumption of resources, but it may not be suitable to them;
however, it will solve the problem for everybody to have ample of nutritious
food and to eliminate poverty for that matter.

Nonetheless, even
if some regions increase their output and traders reduce the mismatch between
supply and demand, doubling food production by 2050 will undeniably be a major
challenge. “Green Revolution” has a lot of advantages saving the lives of millions
against famine. On the other hand, it also has a lot of disadvantages being a short-term
solution to the problem of food shortage. We need a long-term solution that is supportive
and environmental friendly of cultivation needs to be practiced. The world
needs “Green Revolution 2”, which that is not only capable on feeding a growing
world population, that also environmental friendly without jeopardizing the
needs of future generations.

Yet none of these
measures will be sufficient to ensure adequate food supplies for future
generations unless the growth in the human population stop increasing
drastically. In a way, these two problems intertwined with one another. One is
basically the outcome of the other. Maybe the one-child policy law in China may
be effective solution to slow down the growth of the world population and
therefore stopping the growing demand for food, water and energy. Various countries
may need to think about new policies relating to tax exemptions to control
overpopulation. For instance, reducing rates of income tax or relinquish certain
part of the tax for those families who have 1 or two children. This may have positive
results, as we citizens of a society tend to be more inclined towards money.

As population of
this world is growing at a rapid pace, raising awareness among people regarding
family planning and letting them know about serious after effects of
overpopulation and the growing demand for resources can help solve this public
health problem. To avoid any unwanted pregnancy, educating the population about
safe sex techniques and contraceptives methods is one effective strategy. While
the one-child law in China may be too strict for some countries, most of them
stem from debate over abortion rights. Family planning might be a better option
which has for goal to reduce birth rate.

contraception and family planning aren’t the only tools used to help decrease population
growth; there’s also education. Educating the population and helping them understand
that having one or two children at the most is a great planning measure to
implement policies contemplating social change. Families that are facing a hard
life and choose to have four or five children should be discouraged. Women’s
empowerment and education, specifically women’s education, should be a core
component of some countries policy. In a sense, it not only educates women but
build stronger civil society, and staves off unhealthily rapid population

We are not
certainly headed into a world of scarcities, but policymakers and their private
sector partners will need to be hands-on to avoid such a future. Many countries
probably won’t have the means to avoid food and water shortages without massive
help from outside. Tackling problems pertaining to one service won’t be
possible without affecting supply and demand for the others.