Martin Luther King Jr. spent eight days in the jail or Birmingham. Amid that time, he made his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail. “The letter was apparently considered considering a letter that had as of late keep running in a nearby daily paper, which had guaranteed that the differences were “indiscreet and less than ideal”; in any case, King deliberately composed his letter for a national gathering of people. The letter uncovered King’s quality as an advocate and his broadness of learning. It implied various mainstream scholars, and in addition to the Bible. It is enthusiastic and was consequently appropriated by much-written work reading material as a model of enticing composition. At the time, it executed a smooth voice to an outrageous and distorted development. King’s writing depicts that he was influenced by various philosophers like Plato, Descartes, Rousseau and John Stuart Mill during his time. Starting with Plato, Plato discusses thriving in an underground den, fastened against the dividers, couldn’t make a move. Some has been there since youth. The letter from Birmingham Jail essentially a similar perspective, it discusses being captured and tossed behind bars for something they trusted in, particularly Dr. Martin Luther King. He was captured for trusting in non-isolation, the right to speak freely and blacks/whites having similar rights. Like Plato, Martin Luther King discusses utilizing your insight as great or spite. Be that as it may, in King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail, individuals were utilizing what they perceived in a perceptive way. They thought since they had more rights, they could achieve whatever they needed, to whomever they needed to. Dr. Luther was battling for that, he thought there were innovative foul play laws. He states in Letter from Birmingham Jail that: “There are just and unjust laws, an unjust law is a code. that a majority inflicts on a minority that is not binding on. itself. This is a difference made legal, but a just law is a code. that a majority compels on a minority to follow that is willing to follow itself. This is sameness made legal.”(Pg. 113). Similarly, a concept of existentialist also comes along in the letter, while Christians base activities off profound quality and endless salvation. Maybe King’s appeal came not just in his scriptural suggestions, topics of fellowship, and great specialty of talk however in the distinction but also in subjects of religious profundity. By analyzing Martin Luther King, Jr’s. Last discourse through the viewpoint of existentialism, we can perceive how he associated Christian esteems and existentialism to wind up plainly an existentialist saint. To look at Martin Luther King, Jr. as an existentialist legend, it is premier basic to characterize what existentialism really implies as far as present-day activism. Renée Descartes’ “Talk on Method,” in which he most broadly states,”I think, therefore, I am.” Christians regularly view existentialists as being cynical, yet in fact, existentialism offers the likelihood of individual decision and is administered by ethics. A man initially exists, and after that, he can characterize himself any way he picks. People are not constrained by destiny or expectation, but rather can separately assemble themselves through activities. Along these lines, existence is trusted as man is to be considered in charge of his activities since he could govern them. At a point, is one who is effectively mindful of his obligation to himself as well as for humankind. Existence concentrates on activity in the present, and they trust that activities alone are what characterizes a man. “The Social Contract” supported that political changes should be made acknowledging every individual into consideration. In his recommended contract, Rousseau suggested that everybody would be free since they would all surrender a similar measure of rights and similar obligations would be forced on everybody. Rousseau contended that subjugation was counter-instinctive. Rousseau states “finding a type of affiliation which will guard the individual and commodities of every part with the aggregate power of all, and under which every individual, while attaching himself with the others, complies with nobody yet himself, and stays as free as some time recently. “This supposition is extremely suggestive of a bit of King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” “We are altogether gotten in an unpreventable system of commonality tied into a solitary article of clothing of predetermination, whatever influences one straightforwardly influences all by implication,” King composed. Likewise, the reasoning of Utilitarianism concentrates on the general result or consequence of an activity. In any case, Utilitarianism denies validity to the plan behind the activity but instead the outcome or general result. This rule was contended by scholar John Stuart Mill. Despite the pervasion of prejudice in the United States of America amid the 1950s and 60’s, Martin Luther King proposed to change the tide of wrongful convictions. He proposed to and set out to instruct all men on correspondence. Not very many individuals could deny that he was a man driven by respectable attributes and optimistic attitude. He was constrained by his obligation to humanity. “This supposition is extremely suggestive of a bit of King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” His result was undeniably in sociability with his plan. It is ludicrous to deny his impact on the temperance of society. His individual endeavors made swells in the lake of society and realigned the ethical compass. Thus, it is conceivable that the two points of view can be significant when they match. Even though they are both relevant to the general ideas of society, I would need to give more noteworthy validity to Utilitarianism. Martin Luther King Jr. did have the courage to stand firm for what was correct because of which African Americans were privileged to vote in 1965. There were a vast number of individuals that had the fairest of aims, yet none as incredible of an effect as him. This isn’t to dishonor the individuals who likewise battled for measure up to rights. In any case, nobody can deny that Martin Luther King Jr. was on the cutting edge of this fight.