After first test made me know the level of

After taking the personality test and
compared the two sets of questions, I found the questions in the 16 Personalities
more intriguing than those in Big Five Personality Test were. The tactics it
used to approach every structure of my life both physically and mentally made
me learn about my personality in deeper details. This test made me realize that
I have a judging trait and I don’t like to keep my options open and most of the
time when I make a decision, then it becomes final. I also realized that I have
strong work ethics and I put my responsibilities and duties above everything. I
am strict when it comes to the matters of law and order. I am also relaxed and
flexible when dealing with challenges that were
not expected. I would not hesitate to look for a solution because I know
life provides one with challenges and opportunities. I also found out that my
happiness takes priority as opposed to what others expect and I would only take
up those tasks that interest me.

The response to the questions in the
first test made me know the level of confidence I have in my decisions and
abilities. This test acted as an internal sensor that made me realize that the
environment makes me react differently depending on the input I receive from my
surroundings. For example, the feedback I get from people I am relating make me
react differently depending on the circumstances. I realized that my mind
responds differently from the way it interacts with the external world. The
test further made me realize that I am relatively resistant to stress,
even-tempered and self-assured. I rarely push myself beyond the limit to
achieve a certain goal, and I often do not worry much about the uncertainties
of the future. I do not spend much time thinking about those actions I did in
the past or the choices I made. I usually let the past just remain that; the past. I think this is the reason that I
usually find myself being confident in my abilities to handle challenges and
situations that I had not expected.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

In the second personality, scale made me
realize that I am very observant of the actual things happening around me. I
found that I enjoy experiencing, feeling, touching and seeing. I do not like
making possibilities and theorizing, but I would want to do practical work and
focus on issues at hand. I also found out that instead of wondering when and
why things might happen or brainstorm about the future possibilities, I feel
better dealing with concrete objects and facts. I am those people with the personality
of handling one thing at a time instead of doing multiple tasks at the same
time as I find this as draining and energy wasting. Finally, when it comes to
communication, I am a good communicator and would have no problems with
in-depth interpretations or decoding allusions. I usually focus on practical
matters that are clear and factual.

and Disadvantages of the Personality Tests

The Big Five Personality Test is validated as a reliable and consistent
measure of a personality trait. The Generalizability theory could be used to
analyze the reliability of this personality test. Researchers have developed
this theory to understand human behavior better (Kong & Fleming, 2016). The
use of observer ratings and self-report measures have provided evidence that
openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neurotic and
extraversion is a five-factor model of personality.

This model can be used to predict
behavior patterns accurately for a long period. The biggest disadvantage it has
is that it is difficult to predict a single trait using this method. Since
human behavior is determined by a
combination of many factors, then it would be wrong to assume that personality
is the biggest factor to consider when determining a human behavior (van Tienen
& Rothkrantz, 2015). The model also is too broad and universal, and not
age, gender and culturally specific. Women react differently from such
personality traits as extraversion and openness differently from their male
counterparts. Furthermore, these five factors cannot be said to be independent
variables. Lastly, the self-bias where one would fill only the positive
attributes to look good in front of his/ her mates is not predictable (Kong
& Fleming, 2016). People tend to answer questions with an intention of

16Personalities first advantage is that
it is very scientific since a researcher can use a reasonable scoring board
which is quantitative and measurable. Secondly, it is the most renowned method
the researchers use to asses adult populations, and the returns of their
personality attributes are always accurate (van Tienen & Rothkrantz, 2015).
This scale also has numerous disadvantages. Since the enhancement of
technology, the manual validation of the report
is difficult. Only trained personnel can interpret its complex data. The
question mark may lead the respondent to give the middle response as an
infrequency response. The structure is too long for new uses, and the
complexity of its analytical approach does not help the respondents either. The
responses sometimes do not refer to any specific content and therefore confuse
the respondents, and finally, any respondent who is visually impaired would be

Undoubtedly, the 16 Personalities and
the Big Five have been very instrumental in determining the human behavior and
adult personality. This has assisted much
in clinical counseling where the counselors assess the motivational, exciting,
observed and interpersonal dynamics that assist them to plan their treatments.
These methods could also assist the prospective employers to learn about the
traits of the prospective employees, and also organizations to learn about the
members of staff in the events of coaching, team building, collaboration,
outplacement, training, growth, and promotion.